Wholesome Badass

A Work in Progress — Healing from All the Things​

An empty courtroom with light shining across the judge's bench and the words, "When the aggressor occupies the protected position ..." superimposed over the image.

The Protected Position

Something began when I was four years old, and it was reinforced, repeated, normalized, and sustained over the course of decades. The injury wasn’t only the abuse itself. It was also the fact that the person who harmed me was favored, protected, believed, accommodated, and repeatedly restored to a position of legitimacy while I was not. Something bad happened, and the person who did it continued to occupy a protected position while my reality (moments of distress) was judged, minimized, and dismissed. When that happens over and over again, year after year, it makes sense that I began to feel as though my validity, agency, credibility, and even my right to define my own experience had been stripped away. For a very long time, I located the center of gravity in my mother. Now I am considering the possibility that my sister occupied a much more influential position than I had been able to discern. Six and a half years older than me, she was the first grandchild, the first niece, and the favored child. Then came Magda, the last grandchild: highly sensitive, tightly wound, easily activated, and in need of inconvenient soothing. My sensitivity was dismissed as performance. “Quit performing. Stop being dramatic, hysterical, manipulative. Stop trying to get attention.” Nobody taught me how to cope with difficulty, tolerate discomfort, or regulate my nervous system. I think my sister learned that there was power in being able to suck it up and may even have come to feel martyred by it. By keeping me dysregulated through taunting, provocation, and unwanted touching, she gained traction through the contrast in presentation. She appeared composed while I appeared reactive, and ours was a family with very little capacity for visible, observable, unhidable struggle. As I continue to heal, I find myself repeatedly encountering variations of this same pattern. There is a certain kind of personality that seems to require constant elevation, admiration, accommodation, and preferential treatment, and there is a predictable response to anyone whose presence threatens to divert attention from that arrangement. The archetype itself is hardly new. If only authority were evidence of integrity and virtue. If only age, status, confidence, accomplishment, popularity, or proximity to power guaranteed goodness. I was placed on this trajectory at the age of four, and now I am doing the work required to change direction. I am learning to recognize the pattern that I know so well and, without vigilance, continue to mistake for love, safety, familiarity, and home. The familiarity calls to me. Like an old glove, it simply fits. I recognize now that familiarity and safety are not the same thing. Whatever else may be true, this also happened.

Read More
One healthy green tree standing in the middle of a forest of dead trees beneath the quote, “A peak is a moment. A pattern is information.”

The Truth Is in the Pattern

Sheesh. How many more times will I have to navigate this particular circuit before I have learned everything I can from it? The turth is in the pattern, not the explanation. It almost feels as though I have been given a false map. There are things people say that, if I allow them to guide me, will take me completely off course because they don’t align with reality, their actions, or my lived experience. I am starting to recognize that the real story lives inside the patterns. Words do matter. Conversations matter. Moments matter. But patterns persist regardless of what is said. Sometimes there is an incongruency or lack of alignment between words, the suggested intent of those words, and actions. Sometimes things are not communicated directly at all, and yet they are communicated clearly through repeated behaviors. I am intentionally allowing patterns to inform me more than peak moments, conversations, or exchanges. If there is a pleasurable moment in a relationship, I can no longer hold onto that moment as though it represents restoration or the relationship as a whole. I will not waste energy trying to figure out how to get back to that place, as though I have somehow lost the thread. Perhaps it was the exception. Possibly, it was simply a moment. The information is in the pattern. That doesn’t necessarily tell me what is true in some absolute sense, but it does tell me what is real. And when I allow patterns to inform what I say or do next, I am able to remain aligned with my quest for sovereignty and radical neutrality. A thing has happened. I don’t get to change it, reinterpret it, or spin it into something else. I don’t have to lose myself reacting or trying to understand it from every possible angle. I don’t have to overexplain my experience or convince anyone else of it. I can simply acknowledge what is and decide what my actual options are, keeping in alignment with my North Star. Whatever else may be true, this also happened.

Read More
Black-and-white typography graphic with a quote about how relationships require acknowledgment of ruptures in order to repair, and how perfectionism can prevent emotional repair and trust.

When Relationships Stop Evolving

I’ve spent a lot of time thinking about the c-word….”conflict ” and also–avoidance and repair. The archetype, to whom I have gravitated to like a moth to a flame, seems to have little room for either. Being non-pleased feels unacceptable. Causing displeasure feels unacceptable. Being imperfect feels unacceptable. So concerns don’t get raised directly. They leak out sideways through passive aggression, distance, stonewalling, or the preTENSE that everything is fine. The script for that: All good. Everything is fine. No worries. Of course. Perfect. No problem. Good vibes only. smile emoji lol And if someone does directly bring up a concern, the conversation can quickly shift to intentions, perceptions, or disproving any negative impact in the first place. I’ve lived inside enough of those relationships to recognize a clear pattern. One conversation with Sweet Greg from years ago–went differently. I brought up something that would have been disruptive to just about anyone. And he began his reply by explaining his intentions and my perceptions. I finally said, “If the only version of this conversation is the one where everything supports that you had no negative impact, our season has ended. Not because that issue was dramatic or catastrophic but because that manner of communication after conflict is one I’m too familiar with.” That changed the conversation. We stopped trying to establish innocence. We started talking about the impact, which is unmitagted by intention. Neither of us had to be the bad guy. Neither of us had to abandon our dignity. After that, we spent the next six years intentionally getting better at repair. Not because we had constant conflict. Because neither of us had to wonder. If something landed wrong, we said it. If one of us missed the mark, we talked about it. If an apology was needed, it wasn’t treated like a character indictment. Those moments were not dramatic. Most of them were like paper cuts, as far as gravity. But a thousand paper cuts can finally erupt by with irreperable injury. Left alone, “paper cuts” have a way of becoming stories that the cutty tells themselves about how little they matter. Addressed early, they become moments of understanding. Maybe that’s what repair has felt like to me. Not the absence of conflict. The absence of guessing and ruminating. The freedom to ask, “Did something happen?” without fearing the question itself. The freedom to hear, “That landed differently than you intended,” without feeling like either person has to lose. It became natural to laugh at ourselves, own our blind spots, and keep moving toward each other instead of away from each other. That kind of repair didn’t make either of us perfect. It made us close. I’ve only experienced that kind of relationship a handful of times. I think I understand something now that I didn’t then. For me, relationships no longer end because of conflict or a fight. For me, the season has concluded when evolving and expanding have stopped. When there’s not room to speak truth, make an adjustment, extend grace, laugh at ourselves, or discover a better way of loving each other. Or maybe the season just ends, but not because of a fight. And nobody is left to wonder, what did I do or what is going on? Whatever else may be true, this is my experience.

Read More
Text graphic that reads: "Conflict is not the enemy of connection, avoidance is.

The Fragile Structure of Happiness

I’ve been sitting with a word that has always troubled me, a state of “being” that feels out of reach: happiness. There seems to be so little capacity out there to make space for those of us whose life experiences haven’t exactly been a gifted accumulation of things that make you say, yeah, this is good, I want to keep doing it. Perhaps the hardest truth to accept is that my upbringing never provided the raw materials or the architecture required to build or even envision a lasting happiness. The Problem with Toxic Positivity Interesting how frustrated or put out people can get when they run into what they view as unhappy “negative energy” that they cannot relate to, correct or ignore. The toxic positivity crowd seems fragile, openly displeased when things are not exactly their way. Looking closely, it feels like happiness isn’t an organic state of being. A construct built on top of an essential foundation of peace and security. It demands safety and structure to exist at all. Or perhaps the blessed state resilience of a careferee disposition. Expecting happiness to materialize out of nowhere after a foundation has been fractured by neglect and abuse is like demanding a roof when there are no walls. Unhappiness, by that same token, is just the weight of things that tear at that security. Why I Am Wired for Joy And yet, somehow, I am wired for joy. I delight easily. But joy and delight don’t care about a curated stack of ease or good fortunes. They live entirely in the immediate moment of being present and vulnerable. Happiness feels like it requires a whole history and a guaranteed future, but joy requires only the now, a sudden, fertile space which presents itself in the middle of whatever reality actually is. Happiness relies on a world that goes right, while joy only requires the willingness to stay open enough to notice a single, fleeting second of presence, belonging entirely to the moment, independent of a foundation beneath it which may be whole or broken. The Requirement of Happiness I recently learned that in the Mennonite tradition, there is a core insistence that suffering must never be done alone. It stopped me in my tracks. It made me wonder: what is the word for the exact opposite of that? Because the relationships that shaped me and then chosen out of habit—the ones that faithfully mirror my family of origin—operate on a completely different framework. In that world, the unwritten rule is that suffering doesn’t exist for the right kind of people. If it does, it must be masked, suppressed, blamed, and cast away– if you can’t manage it as prescribed. It’s an energy that says suffering is for losers, an energy that promises, “I’ll give you something to cry about.” The Autocracy of the Untroubled Growing up, happiness seemed a strict requirement. Yet, there was zero consideration for the lower levels of security—no foundational, protective caretaking that could flow into actual happiness. Instead, my sensitivities/struggles were used as evidence against me in a sort of autocratic system. Those who are not troubled or taxed with more than they can handle believe their peace is a birthright they earned and shall not be troubled by anyone lesser. By that same insulting logic, they identify most anyone hit by things consistently they cannot get back up from as deserving of the fall. Looking back, I wonder how my “care givers” believed it possible for me to be happy when I was chronically overwhelmed, without a steady support or floor beneath me. Sitting in Darkness: Ten Minutes a Day I listened to a podcast recently with Kate Bowler, a survivor of stage four cancer at a surprisingly young age. She talked about how many people really just do not want to know the truth of a difficult reality. In the season in which she thought she was months away from death, parting her from aloving family, husband and young son, a co-worker asked how she was doing, and she gave a brilliantly genuine answer: “I’m doing mostly okay, except for about ten minutes every day.” He didn’t say, “Well, at least it’s only ten minutes”. He didn’t offer a dismissive holow reassurance or pivot away from discomfort. Instead, he looked her in the eyes and said, “Will you tell me about those ten minutes?” It was a glaring, beautiful contrast to the standard script. No toxic positivity, no rushing to fix or minimize it, no turning away. Genuine inquiry – a quiet, compassionate presence willing to sit in the dark with someone else’s ten minutes. Kate wrote a piece in one of her books that captures that rare posture perfectly: Blessing for the Ones Who Stay Blessed are you who stay. Who sit beside pain that cannot be fixed. Who choose presence over platitudes, and silence over shallow comfort. Blessed are you who ask hard questions without rushing toward answers. Who bear witness to the kind of grief that rearranges the world. You who try. Try to imagine. Try to listen. Try to love in the absence of tidy outcomes. May your staying be its own kind of balm. Because it says: your pain matters. You matter. And may you feel, even now, that this, too, is holy. To stay. To try. To say yes to life in all of its complexity. And to love each other all the way through. The Courage to Stay It takes courage—and intentional humility—to stay present with someone whose reality is grim. Why is that so rare? Entitled people often behave as though the suffering are the fragile ones. But couldn’t fragility be more accurately defined as the inability to acknowledge, engage with, or endure difficulty? I am many things, but I am not fucking fragile. Those who judge me most harshly would crumble after a mile in my shoes. And then, with absolute conviction, they’d insist that if I were a better person, I’d have better shoes. What’s interesting is how comfortable—if not confident—these folks seem with speaking and doing harm while banking on their target being too ashamed to acknowledge the harm done. It’s a kind of meritocracy bullshit: if you’re suffering, you must have earned it; if you’re struggling, it must be a character flaw. That belief conveniently absolves them of any responsibility for the damage they cause.

Read More
Text image of Winston Churchill quote: “An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last,” representing appeasement, coercive control, trauma bonding, and survival in toxic family systems and emotionally abusive relationships.

Healing From Narcissistic Family Systems

I’ve been reflecting on how, in my family—and unironically, in the family of the man I had children with—belonging was not rooted in mutual care, nuance, or individuality. It was rooted in alignment with the people who had decided, and been supported in believing, that they mattered more. Agreement equaled safety. Divergence tracked as threat. There was no space for statements like, “I see it differently,” or “I’m hurt,” or “I need something else,” or even the simple, honest, “This doesn’t work for me.” For everyone but the person who positioned themselves at the center, those weren’t treated as communication but as defection. And once a thing was regarded as defection, the goal was not understanding but eradicating the instability. Restoring an illusion of unity. That meant conforming, suppressing, or being cast as the problem itself. There was no option to simply and safely be—without signaling allegiance. You were either reinforcing the prescribed doctrine or destabilizing it. In systems built on reverence for the ones who’ve assumed the right to define reality and whose comfort functions as law, there is no middle ground. You’re either with me or against me. That system did not simply banish me. It smeared me, discarded me, and snatches at my children, insisting I “forfeited” them by being different crazy — which, in that arrangement, meant nothing more than refusing to agree to matter less. I cannot abide. I won’t.

Read More
James Baldwin quote about facing truth overlaid on a minimalist image symbolizing emotional clarity, reflection, and the cost of acknowledgment.

The Limits of One-Sided Repair

Letting Go Each day, I live with the ache that I may not see my children again. We may not have another real conversation or moment of closeness. That may be the outcome when children grow in a system that teaches them to diminish me, and when they have no outside support to question that story. I can see how neatly the story lands if I’m “too much,” or if I “opted out.” But I didn’t opt out of love. I opted out of interactions that diminished me, and out of being judged for the pain I carried in response to that. When my older son stopped by this week to pick up some belongings, he said, “OK then, I guess I’ll just keep working on myself.” The tone was pure “seeyuh.” Calm. Clean. Detached. His dad would be impressed. It wasn’t confrontation. It wasn’t repair. It was distance dressed up as resolution. It created a sense of closure without anything actually being closed. His lack of genuine interest made it clear that the decision had already been made somewhere else. When I imagine the worst‑case scenarios — illness, death, finality — I feel no guilt for what I’ve said or done. My choices have always reflected prioritizing them. I feel no shame. I cannot bridge a gap that was created by design, by people frustrated with my lack of reverence and submission. And bridging that gap requires mutual engagement. The cycle begs to repeat. I don’t feel I have amends to make. I continue working on myself because I am here to grow, heal, and love. I know I have been truthful, kind, loyal, and wholesome as a mother. Not perfect, but great in the years before the triangulation that crushed me. My greatest regret is how much exposure they had to my pain, and how my reactions shaped their experience of me. It robbed them of access to parts of me that existed outside suffering. But I didn’t choose the pain. I did the best I could while living inside it. I am neither proud nor ashamed. I accept what was. I accept what is. And I accept that we may not find our way back to each other in this lifetime. As I once said to my family of origin: My first choice is to heal with you. My second is to just heal. I never stopped trying. And- I no longer accept the old belief that I should be grateful for whatever version of connection I’m handed. I’m choosing peace that doesn’t require self‑erasure. No more entanglement with anyone of the mindset that their peace and comfort matter more than others.

Read More
Goat standing alone on a cliff symbolizing family scapegoating and avoidance of responsibility

The War They Wanted: A Story of Estrangement

My sons learned, by design, to have zero tolerance for their mother. Ordinary acts of parenting—direction, correction, consequences, even simple questions—were rejected and reframed as manipulation or control. I once read a message from their father telling them, “Disregard your mother.” And they did. Their dismissal was not only permitted but modeled, reinforced, and quietly supported by people who positioned themselves as adversaries. During months of medical crisis—unmanaged pain, heavy medication, complications, emotional collapse—I was met with silence. I lost forty pounds. I couldn’t sit, stand, or lie down without pain. Without sleep, I struggled to function. My children showed little response, a kind of learned distance. My medical devastation wasn’t received as a call for care, but seemed to reinforce the narrative they had been taught to hold. Soon after that year of collapse came two heart attacks—more data, more interpretation, more judgment. I can hold compassion for how my children were shaped without accepting mercilessness as something I choose to live near. My healing has required restraint, even when injustice invites engagement. Over time, my options narrowed to two: escalate or collapse. In that narrowing, the structure became clear. Conflict was the point. They wanted a war—because war produces a winner and a loser, and in war, restraint is a liability. There is no framework of love or care in which it is acceptable to erase a parent. Participating in any activity that knowingly divides children from a parent is emotional violence. I continue to learn about the generational dynamics of scapegoating and parental alienation. I recognize myself in the stories of others whose former partners aligned with extended families in campaigns framed as concern—please pray for her, we’re worried—while undermining, diminishing, and dividing.

Read More
An empty courtroom with light shining across the judge's bench and the words, "When the aggressor occupies the protected position ..." superimposed over the image.

The Protected Position

Something began when I was four years old, and it was reinforced, repeated, normalized, and sustained over the course of decades. The injury wasn’t only the abuse itself. It was also the fact that the person who harmed me was favored, protected, believed, accommodated, and repeatedly restored to a position of legitimacy while I was not. Something bad happened, and the person who did it continued to occupy a protected position while my reality (moments of distress) was judged, minimized, and dismissed. When that happens over and over again, year after year, it makes sense that I began to feel as though my validity, agency, credibility, and even my right to define my own experience had been stripped away. For a very long time, I located the center of gravity in my mother. Now I am considering the possibility that my sister occupied a much more influential position than I had been able to discern. Six and a half years older than me, she was the first grandchild, the first niece, and the favored child. Then came Magda, the last grandchild: highly sensitive, tightly wound, easily activated, and in need of inconvenient soothing. My sensitivity was dismissed as performance. “Quit performing. Stop being dramatic, hysterical, manipulative. Stop trying to get attention.” Nobody taught me how to cope with difficulty, tolerate discomfort, or regulate my nervous system. I think my sister learned that there was power in being able to suck it up and may even have come to feel martyred by it. By keeping me dysregulated through taunting, provocation, and unwanted touching, she gained traction through the contrast in presentation. She appeared composed while I appeared reactive, and ours was a family with very little capacity for visible, observable, unhidable struggle. As I continue to heal, I find myself repeatedly encountering variations of this same pattern. There is a certain kind of personality that seems to require constant elevation, admiration, accommodation, and preferential treatment, and there is a predictable response to anyone whose presence threatens to divert attention from that arrangement. The archetype itself is hardly new. If only authority were evidence of integrity and virtue. If only age, status, confidence, accomplishment, popularity, or proximity to power guaranteed goodness. I was placed on this trajectory at the age of four, and now I am doing the work required to change direction. I am learning to recognize the pattern that I know so well and, without vigilance, continue to mistake for love, safety, familiarity, and home. The familiarity calls to me. Like an old glove, it simply fits. I recognize now that familiarity and safety are not the same thing. Whatever else may be true, this also happened.

Read More
One healthy green tree standing in the middle of a forest of dead trees beneath the quote, “A peak is a moment. A pattern is information.”

The Truth Is in the Pattern

Sheesh. How many more times will I have to navigate this particular circuit before I have learned everything I can from it? The turth is in the pattern, not the explanation. It almost feels as though I have been given a false map. There are things people say that, if I allow them to guide me, will take me completely off course because they don’t align with reality, their actions, or my lived experience. I am starting to recognize that the real story lives inside the patterns. Words do matter. Conversations matter. Moments matter. But patterns persist regardless of what is said. Sometimes there is an incongruency or lack of alignment between words, the suggested intent of those words, and actions. Sometimes things are not communicated directly at all, and yet they are communicated clearly through repeated behaviors. I am intentionally allowing patterns to inform me more than peak moments, conversations, or exchanges. If there is a pleasurable moment in a relationship, I can no longer hold onto that moment as though it represents restoration or the relationship as a whole. I will not waste energy trying to figure out how to get back to that place, as though I have somehow lost the thread. Perhaps it was the exception. Possibly, it was simply a moment. The information is in the pattern. That doesn’t necessarily tell me what is true in some absolute sense, but it does tell me what is real. And when I allow patterns to inform what I say or do next, I am able to remain aligned with my quest for sovereignty and radical neutrality. A thing has happened. I don’t get to change it, reinterpret it, or spin it into something else. I don’t have to lose myself reacting or trying to understand it from every possible angle. I don’t have to overexplain my experience or convince anyone else of it. I can simply acknowledge what is and decide what my actual options are, keeping in alignment with my North Star. Whatever else may be true, this also happened.

Read More
Black-and-white typography graphic with a quote about how relationships require acknowledgment of ruptures in order to repair, and how perfectionism can prevent emotional repair and trust.

When Relationships Stop Evolving

I’ve spent a lot of time thinking about the c-word….”conflict ” and also–avoidance and repair. The archetype, to whom I have gravitated to like a moth to a flame, seems to have little room for either. Being non-pleased feels unacceptable. Causing displeasure feels unacceptable. Being imperfect feels unacceptable. So concerns don’t get raised directly. They leak out sideways through passive aggression, distance, stonewalling, or the preTENSE that everything is fine. The script for that: All good. Everything is fine. No worries. Of course. Perfect. No problem. Good vibes only. smile emoji lol And if someone does directly bring up a concern, the conversation can quickly shift to intentions, perceptions, or disproving any negative impact in the first place. I’ve lived inside enough of those relationships to recognize a clear pattern. One conversation with Sweet Greg from years ago–went differently. I brought up something that would have been disruptive to just about anyone. And he began his reply by explaining his intentions and my perceptions. I finally said, “If the only version of this conversation is the one where everything supports that you had no negative impact, our season has ended. Not because that issue was dramatic or catastrophic but because that manner of communication after conflict is one I’m too familiar with.” That changed the conversation. We stopped trying to establish innocence. We started talking about the impact, which is unmitagted by intention. Neither of us had to be the bad guy. Neither of us had to abandon our dignity. After that, we spent the next six years intentionally getting better at repair. Not because we had constant conflict. Because neither of us had to wonder. If something landed wrong, we said it. If one of us missed the mark, we talked about it. If an apology was needed, it wasn’t treated like a character indictment. Those moments were not dramatic. Most of them were like paper cuts, as far as gravity. But a thousand paper cuts can finally erupt by with irreperable injury. Left alone, “paper cuts” have a way of becoming stories that the cutty tells themselves about how little they matter. Addressed early, they become moments of understanding. Maybe that’s what repair has felt like to me. Not the absence of conflict. The absence of guessing and ruminating. The freedom to ask, “Did something happen?” without fearing the question itself. The freedom to hear, “That landed differently than you intended,” without feeling like either person has to lose. It became natural to laugh at ourselves, own our blind spots, and keep moving toward each other instead of away from each other. That kind of repair didn’t make either of us perfect. It made us close. I’ve only experienced that kind of relationship a handful of times. I think I understand something now that I didn’t then. For me, relationships no longer end because of conflict or a fight. For me, the season has concluded when evolving and expanding have stopped. When there’s not room to speak truth, make an adjustment, extend grace, laugh at ourselves, or discover a better way of loving each other. Or maybe the season just ends, but not because of a fight. And nobody is left to wonder, what did I do or what is going on? Whatever else may be true, this is my experience.

Read More
Text graphic that reads: "Conflict is not the enemy of connection, avoidance is.

The Fragile Structure of Happiness

I’ve been sitting with a word that has always troubled me, a state of “being” that feels out of reach: happiness. There seems to be so little capacity out there to make space for those of us whose life experiences haven’t exactly been a gifted accumulation of things that make you say, yeah, this is good, I want to keep doing it. Perhaps the hardest truth to accept is that my upbringing never provided the raw materials or the architecture required to build or even envision a lasting happiness. The Problem with Toxic Positivity Interesting how frustrated or put out people can get when they run into what they view as unhappy “negative energy” that they cannot relate to, correct or ignore. The toxic positivity crowd seems fragile, openly displeased when things are not exactly their way. Looking closely, it feels like happiness isn’t an organic state of being. A construct built on top of an essential foundation of peace and security. It demands safety and structure to exist at all. Or perhaps the blessed state resilience of a careferee disposition. Expecting happiness to materialize out of nowhere after a foundation has been fractured by neglect and abuse is like demanding a roof when there are no walls. Unhappiness, by that same token, is just the weight of things that tear at that security. Why I Am Wired for Joy And yet, somehow, I am wired for joy. I delight easily. But joy and delight don’t care about a curated stack of ease or good fortunes. They live entirely in the immediate moment of being present and vulnerable. Happiness feels like it requires a whole history and a guaranteed future, but joy requires only the now, a sudden, fertile space which presents itself in the middle of whatever reality actually is. Happiness relies on a world that goes right, while joy only requires the willingness to stay open enough to notice a single, fleeting second of presence, belonging entirely to the moment, independent of a foundation beneath it which may be whole or broken. The Requirement of Happiness I recently learned that in the Mennonite tradition, there is a core insistence that suffering must never be done alone. It stopped me in my tracks. It made me wonder: what is the word for the exact opposite of that? Because the relationships that shaped me and then chosen out of habit—the ones that faithfully mirror my family of origin—operate on a completely different framework. In that world, the unwritten rule is that suffering doesn’t exist for the right kind of people. If it does, it must be masked, suppressed, blamed, and cast away– if you can’t manage it as prescribed. It’s an energy that says suffering is for losers, an energy that promises, “I’ll give you something to cry about.” The Autocracy of the Untroubled Growing up, happiness seemed a strict requirement. Yet, there was zero consideration for the lower levels of security—no foundational, protective caretaking that could flow into actual happiness. Instead, my sensitivities/struggles were used as evidence against me in a sort of autocratic system. Those who are not troubled or taxed with more than they can handle believe their peace is a birthright they earned and shall not be troubled by anyone lesser. By that same insulting logic, they identify most anyone hit by things consistently they cannot get back up from as deserving of the fall. Looking back, I wonder how my “care givers” believed it possible for me to be happy when I was chronically overwhelmed, without a steady support or floor beneath me. Sitting in Darkness: Ten Minutes a Day I listened to a podcast recently with Kate Bowler, a survivor of stage four cancer at a surprisingly young age. She talked about how many people really just do not want to know the truth of a difficult reality. In the season in which she thought she was months away from death, parting her from aloving family, husband and young son, a co-worker asked how she was doing, and she gave a brilliantly genuine answer: “I’m doing mostly okay, except for about ten minutes every day.” He didn’t say, “Well, at least it’s only ten minutes”. He didn’t offer a dismissive holow reassurance or pivot away from discomfort. Instead, he looked her in the eyes and said, “Will you tell me about those ten minutes?” It was a glaring, beautiful contrast to the standard script. No toxic positivity, no rushing to fix or minimize it, no turning away. Genuine inquiry – a quiet, compassionate presence willing to sit in the dark with someone else’s ten minutes. Kate wrote a piece in one of her books that captures that rare posture perfectly: Blessing for the Ones Who Stay Blessed are you who stay. Who sit beside pain that cannot be fixed. Who choose presence over platitudes, and silence over shallow comfort. Blessed are you who ask hard questions without rushing toward answers. Who bear witness to the kind of grief that rearranges the world. You who try. Try to imagine. Try to listen. Try to love in the absence of tidy outcomes. May your staying be its own kind of balm. Because it says: your pain matters. You matter. And may you feel, even now, that this, too, is holy. To stay. To try. To say yes to life in all of its complexity. And to love each other all the way through. The Courage to Stay It takes courage—and intentional humility—to stay present with someone whose reality is grim. Why is that so rare? Entitled people often behave as though the suffering are the fragile ones. But couldn’t fragility be more accurately defined as the inability to acknowledge, engage with, or endure difficulty? I am many things, but I am not fucking fragile. Those who judge me most harshly would crumble after a mile in my shoes. And then, with absolute conviction, they’d insist that if I were a better person, I’d have better shoes. What’s interesting is how comfortable—if not confident—these folks seem with speaking and doing harm while banking on their target being too ashamed to acknowledge the harm done. It’s a kind of meritocracy bullshit: if you’re suffering, you must have earned it; if you’re struggling, it must be a character flaw. That belief conveniently absolves them of any responsibility for the damage they cause.

Read More
Text image of Winston Churchill quote: “An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last,” representing appeasement, coercive control, trauma bonding, and survival in toxic family systems and emotionally abusive relationships.

Healing From Narcissistic Family Systems

I’ve been reflecting on how, in my family—and unironically, in the family of the man I had children with—belonging was not rooted in mutual care, nuance, or individuality. It was rooted in alignment with the people who had decided, and been supported in believing, that they mattered more. Agreement equaled safety. Divergence tracked as threat. There was no space for statements like, “I see it differently,” or “I’m hurt,” or “I need something else,” or even the simple, honest, “This doesn’t work for me.” For everyone but the person who positioned themselves at the center, those weren’t treated as communication but as defection. And once a thing was regarded as defection, the goal was not understanding but eradicating the instability. Restoring an illusion of unity. That meant conforming, suppressing, or being cast as the problem itself. There was no option to simply and safely be—without signaling allegiance. You were either reinforcing the prescribed doctrine or destabilizing it. In systems built on reverence for the ones who’ve assumed the right to define reality and whose comfort functions as law, there is no middle ground. You’re either with me or against me. That system did not simply banish me. It smeared me, discarded me, and snatches at my children, insisting I “forfeited” them by being different crazy — which, in that arrangement, meant nothing more than refusing to agree to matter less. I cannot abide. I won’t.

Read More
James Baldwin quote about facing truth overlaid on a minimalist image symbolizing emotional clarity, reflection, and the cost of acknowledgment.

The Limits of One-Sided Repair

Letting Go Each day, I live with the ache that I may not see my children again. We may not have another real conversation or moment of closeness. That may be the outcome when children grow in a system that teaches them to diminish me, and when they have no outside support to question that story. I can see how neatly the story lands if I’m “too much,” or if I “opted out.” But I didn’t opt out of love. I opted out of interactions that diminished me, and out of being judged for the pain I carried in response to that. When my older son stopped by this week to pick up some belongings, he said, “OK then, I guess I’ll just keep working on myself.” The tone was pure “seeyuh.” Calm. Clean. Detached. His dad would be impressed. It wasn’t confrontation. It wasn’t repair. It was distance dressed up as resolution. It created a sense of closure without anything actually being closed. His lack of genuine interest made it clear that the decision had already been made somewhere else. When I imagine the worst‑case scenarios — illness, death, finality — I feel no guilt for what I’ve said or done. My choices have always reflected prioritizing them. I feel no shame. I cannot bridge a gap that was created by design, by people frustrated with my lack of reverence and submission. And bridging that gap requires mutual engagement. The cycle begs to repeat. I don’t feel I have amends to make. I continue working on myself because I am here to grow, heal, and love. I know I have been truthful, kind, loyal, and wholesome as a mother. Not perfect, but great in the years before the triangulation that crushed me. My greatest regret is how much exposure they had to my pain, and how my reactions shaped their experience of me. It robbed them of access to parts of me that existed outside suffering. But I didn’t choose the pain. I did the best I could while living inside it. I am neither proud nor ashamed. I accept what was. I accept what is. And I accept that we may not find our way back to each other in this lifetime. As I once said to my family of origin: My first choice is to heal with you. My second is to just heal. I never stopped trying. And- I no longer accept the old belief that I should be grateful for whatever version of connection I’m handed. I’m choosing peace that doesn’t require self‑erasure. No more entanglement with anyone of the mindset that their peace and comfort matter more than others.

Read More
Goat standing alone on a cliff symbolizing family scapegoating and avoidance of responsibility

The War They Wanted: A Story of Estrangement

My sons learned, by design, to have zero tolerance for their mother. Ordinary acts of parenting—direction, correction, consequences, even simple questions—were rejected and reframed as manipulation or control. I once read a message from their father telling them, “Disregard your mother.” And they did. Their dismissal was not only permitted but modeled, reinforced, and quietly supported by people who positioned themselves as adversaries. During months of medical crisis—unmanaged pain, heavy medication, complications, emotional collapse—I was met with silence. I lost forty pounds. I couldn’t sit, stand, or lie down without pain. Without sleep, I struggled to function. My children showed little response, a kind of learned distance. My medical devastation wasn’t received as a call for care, but seemed to reinforce the narrative they had been taught to hold. Soon after that year of collapse came two heart attacks—more data, more interpretation, more judgment. I can hold compassion for how my children were shaped without accepting mercilessness as something I choose to live near. My healing has required restraint, even when injustice invites engagement. Over time, my options narrowed to two: escalate or collapse. In that narrowing, the structure became clear. Conflict was the point. They wanted a war—because war produces a winner and a loser, and in war, restraint is a liability. There is no framework of love or care in which it is acceptable to erase a parent. Participating in any activity that knowingly divides children from a parent is emotional violence. I continue to learn about the generational dynamics of scapegoating and parental alienation. I recognize myself in the stories of others whose former partners aligned with extended families in campaigns framed as concern—please pray for her, we’re worried—while undermining, diminishing, and dividing.

Read More